Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Translate.com by Humans | Hide Ticket Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Translate.com by Humans | Hide Ticket Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 81 | ★ 864 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Hide Ticket Fields is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Translate.com by Humans's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Translate.com by Humans at Free to install, Hide Ticket Fields at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Hide Ticket Fields has the larger user base (864 reviews vs 81), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Translate.com by Humans's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Hide Ticket Fields; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Translate.com by Humans's 81-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Hide Ticket Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Translate.com by Humans audit • Hide Ticket Fields audit
Both Translate.com by Humans and Hide Ticket Fields offer paid plans only. Translate.com by Humans starts at Free to install; Hide Ticket Fields starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Hide Ticket Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 864 reviews) compared to Translate.com by Humans (3.0★ from 81 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Translate.com by Humans fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Hide Ticket Fields is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Hide Ticket Fields has more onboarding documentation maturity (864 reviews vs 81), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Translate.com by Humans typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (81 reviews). Hide Ticket Fields aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (864 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Translate.com by Humans and Hide Ticket Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Translate.com by Humans" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
