Loading content…
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| GitHub by TissueApp | Tasks and Subtickets | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | GitHub by TissueApp | Tasks and Subtickets |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 58 | ★ 665 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free 14-day trial | Multiple plans available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
GitHub by TissueApp and Tasks and Subtickets are evenly matched on rating (4.0★ vs 4.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. On pricing, GitHub by TissueApp offers a free tier (Free 14-day trial) while Tasks and Subtickets starts at Multiple plans available. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Tasks and Subtickets has the larger user base (665 reviews vs 58), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GitHub by TissueApp's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GitHub by TissueApp audit • Tasks and Subtickets audit
GitHub by TissueApp is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free 14-day trial). Tasks and Subtickets starts at Multiple plans available. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GitHub by TissueApp (4.0★, 58 reviews) and Tasks and Subtickets (4.0★, 665 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GitHub by TissueApp fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Tasks and Subtickets is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Tasks and Subtickets has more onboarding documentation maturity (665 reviews vs 58), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GitHub by TissueApp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (58 reviews). Tasks and Subtickets aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (665 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GitHub by TissueApp and Tasks and Subtickets both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub by TissueApp" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.