- Title Length19/50 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator Usage
Loading content…
GitHub by TissueApp
Independent listing audit — Zendesk
65/100·grade C·14 open checks·23 measured · 23 total·★ 4 (58)·0 changes in 30 days·audited Oct 30, 2026
Quick verdict
GitHub by TissueApp scores 65/100 (grade C) — 3 fails and 11 warnings across 23 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Languages — fixing its one open check, Language Count (medium impact) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Description & Content at 100/100. Audited Oct 30, 2026.
Top fixes
- Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
- Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags
- Privacy Policy (Technical & Support, high impact, up to 2.5 points) — No privacy policy
65/100
Grade C
Needs work
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when GitHub by TissueApp or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How GitHub by TissueApp's 65/100 breaks down
GitHub by TissueApp's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: Description & Content at 100/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Languages — fixing its one open check, Language Count (medium impact) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points) and Visual Assets (up to 5 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Zendesk Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is GitHub by TissueApp's Zendesk listing audit score?
GitHub by TissueApp scores 65/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 100/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is GitHub by TissueApp doing well?
GitHub by TissueApp's strongest section is Description & Content at 100/100; all 4 checks in it pass.
What should GitHub by TissueApp fix first?
Languages: Language Count (No languages listed; medium impact). Fixing it is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 4 other sections have smaller open fixes.
Explore further
- GitHub by TissueApp listing history0 detected changes in the last 30 days.
- Primary-category audit benchmarkHow GitHub by TissueApp's 65/100 compares with the top-audited listings in its primary Zendesk category.
- GitHub by TissueApp app overviewPricing, features, ratings and rankings for GitHub by TissueApp on Zendesk.
- Compare GitHub by TissueApp with another appPut GitHub by TissueApp side by side with a rival Zendesk listing.
- All Zendesk listing auditsBrowse audit scores for other Zendesk apps.
- How the audit is scoredThe 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands.