Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Time Tracker by TimeCamp | Linked Ticket | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Time Tracker by TimeCamp | Linked Ticket |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 1.7k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Time Tracker by TimeCamp is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Linked Ticket's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Time Tracker by TimeCamp at Free to install, Linked Ticket at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Linked Ticket has the larger user base (1,728 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Time Tracker by TimeCamp's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Time Tracker by TimeCamp; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Linked Ticket's 1,728-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Time Tracker by TimeCamp's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time Tracker by TimeCamp audit • Linked Ticket audit
| Keyword | Time Tracker by TimeCamp | Linked Ticket |
|---|---|---|
| analytics | #19 | Not ranked |
Both Time Tracker by TimeCamp and Linked Ticket offer paid plans only. Time Tracker by TimeCamp starts at Free to install; Linked Ticket starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time Tracker by TimeCamp has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to Linked Ticket (3.0★ from 1,728 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Time Tracker by TimeCamp holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Linked Ticket has the deeper published review base (1,728 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Time Tracker by TimeCamp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Linked Ticket typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,728 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time Tracker by TimeCamp and Linked Ticket both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Time Tracker by TimeCamp" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.