Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| SnapCall Visual AI | Tasks and Subtickets | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | SnapCall Visual AI | Tasks and Subtickets |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 43 | ★ 665 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free to install | Multiple plans available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, SnapCall Visual AI is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Tasks and Subtickets's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, SnapCall Visual AI offers a free tier (Free to install) while Tasks and Subtickets starts at Multiple plans available. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Tasks and Subtickets has the larger user base (665 reviews vs 43), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SnapCall Visual AI's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to SnapCall Visual AI; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Tasks and Subtickets's 665-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SnapCall Visual AI's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: SnapCall Visual AI audit • Tasks and Subtickets audit
SnapCall Visual AI is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free to install). Tasks and Subtickets starts at Multiple plans available. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
SnapCall Visual AI has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 43 reviews) compared to Tasks and Subtickets (4.0★ from 665 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. SnapCall Visual AI fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Tasks and Subtickets is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Tasks and Subtickets has more onboarding documentation maturity (665 reviews vs 43), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
SnapCall Visual AI typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (43 reviews). Tasks and Subtickets aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (665 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. SnapCall Visual AI and Tasks and Subtickets both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SnapCall Visual AI" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
