Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Related Tickets by Custom Field | Five Most Recent | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Show a list of tickets with the same Custom Field value as current ticket
| Metric | Related Tickets by Custom Field | Five Most Recent |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 13 | ★ 8.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Related Tickets by Custom Field is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Five Most Recent's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Related Tickets by Custom Field at Free, Five Most Recent at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Five Most Recent has the larger user base (8,605 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Related Tickets by Custom Field's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Related Tickets by Custom Field; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Five Most Recent's 8,605-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Related Tickets by Custom Field's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Related Tickets by Custom Field audit • Five Most Recent audit
Both Related Tickets by Custom Field and Five Most Recent offer paid plans only. Related Tickets by Custom Field starts at Free; Five Most Recent starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Related Tickets by Custom Field has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to Five Most Recent (3.0★ from 8,605 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Related Tickets by Custom Field holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Five Most Recent has the deeper published review base (8,605 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Related Tickets by Custom Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). Five Most Recent typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (8,605 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Related Tickets by Custom Field and Five Most Recent both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Related Tickets by Custom Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
