Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Forwarder | WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Forwarder | WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Simplify WhatsApp & SMS messaging through Zendesk | Boost CX & EX strategies.
| Metric | Forwarder | WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 7 | 7 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free 14-day trial | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Forwarder's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Forwarder at Free 14-day trial, WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Forwarder's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Forwarder audit • WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging audit
Both Forwarder and WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging offer paid plans only. Forwarder starts at Free 14-day trial; WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 7 reviews) compared to Forwarder (4.0★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly, and the Zendesk Marketplace publishes no review base that would let us infer it for these two — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Forwarder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Forwarder and WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WhatsApp by Conciex.Messaging" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.