Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Suggested answers based on past tickets & knowledge base - with reasoning
| AI Copilot by Pluno | Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | AI Copilot by Pluno | Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 14 | ★ 5.7k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, AI Copilot by Pluno is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Time Tracking's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: AI Copilot by Pluno at Free to install, Time Tracking at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Time Tracking has the larger user base (5,675 reviews vs 14), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AI Copilot by Pluno's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to AI Copilot by Pluno; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Time Tracking's 5,675-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AI Copilot by Pluno's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AI Copilot by Pluno audit • Time Tracking audit
Both AI Copilot by Pluno and Time Tracking offer paid plans only. AI Copilot by Pluno starts at Free to install; Time Tracking starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AI Copilot by Pluno has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to Time Tracking (4.0★ from 5,675 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. AI Copilot by Pluno fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Time Tracking is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Time Tracking has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,675 reviews vs 14), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
AI Copilot by Pluno typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (14 reviews). Time Tracking aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,675 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AI Copilot by Pluno and Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AI Copilot by Pluno" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
