SweetHawk Suite vs RingEX by RingCentral

Based on the data on this page, SweetHawk Suite is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs RingEX by RingCentral's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: SweetHawk Suite at Free to install, RingEX by RingCentral at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

RingEX by RingCentral has the larger user base (153 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SweetHawk Suite's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to SweetHawk Suite; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RingEX by RingCentral's 153-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SweetHawk Suite's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is SweetHawk Suite or RingEX by RingCentral cheaper?

Both SweetHawk Suite and RingEX by RingCentral offer paid plans only. SweetHawk Suite starts at Free to install; RingEX by RingCentral starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, SweetHawk Suite or RingEX by RingCentral?

SweetHawk Suite has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to RingEX by RingCentral (3.0★ from 153 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose SweetHawk Suite or RingEX by RingCentral?

SweetHawk Suite holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, SweetHawk Suite or RingEX by RingCentral?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. RingEX by RingCentral has the deeper published review base (153 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Zendesk Marketplace support teams?

SweetHawk Suite typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). RingEX by RingCentral typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (153 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between SweetHawk Suite and RingEX by RingCentral?

Migration support varies by app and category. SweetHawk Suite and RingEX by RingCentral both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SweetHawk Suite" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.