Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
View PDFs natively in Zendesk & extract text. Fully client-side.
| Native PDF Viewer & Extractor | Hide Ticket Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Native PDF Viewer & Extractor | Hide Ticket Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 865 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free 14-day trial | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Hide Ticket Fields is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Native PDF Viewer & Extractor's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Native PDF Viewer & Extractor at Free 14-day trial, Hide Ticket Fields at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Hide Ticket Fields has the larger user base (865 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Native PDF Viewer & Extractor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Hide Ticket Fields; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Native PDF Viewer & Extractor's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Hide Ticket Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Native PDF Viewer & Extractor audit • Hide Ticket Fields audit
No tracked changes.
Both Native PDF Viewer & Extractor and Hide Ticket Fields offer paid plans only. Native PDF Viewer & Extractor starts at Free 14-day trial; Hide Ticket Fields starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Hide Ticket Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 865 reviews) compared to Native PDF Viewer & Extractor (3.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Hide Ticket Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Hide Ticket Fields has the deeper published review base (865 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Native PDF Viewer & Extractor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Hide Ticket Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (865 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Native PDF Viewer & Extractor and Hide Ticket Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Native PDF Viewer & Extractor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
