Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Salesforce | App Reviews by AppFollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Monitor and respond to iOS, Android, and Samsung reviews right from Zendesk.
| Metric | Salesforce | App Reviews by AppFollow |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.5k | 22 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, App Reviews by AppFollow is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Salesforce's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Salesforce at Free, App Reviews by AppFollow at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Salesforce has the larger user base (1,495 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. App Reviews by AppFollow's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to App Reviews by AppFollow; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Salesforce's 1,495-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than App Reviews by AppFollow's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Salesforce audit • App Reviews by AppFollow audit
Both Salesforce and App Reviews by AppFollow offer paid plans only. Salesforce starts at Free; App Reviews by AppFollow starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
App Reviews by AppFollow has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 22 reviews) compared to Salesforce (3.0★ from 1,495 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
App Reviews by AppFollow holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Salesforce has the deeper published review base (1,495 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,495 reviews). App Reviews by AppFollow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Salesforce and App Reviews by AppFollow both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from App Reviews by AppFollow" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
