Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| XO Insert Code | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | XO Insert Code | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 103 | ★ 5.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 1 | ★ 7 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 25 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2018 | Sep 2017 |
XO Insert Code and PageFly Landing Page Builder are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: XO Insert Code at Free, PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,641 reviews vs 103), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. XO Insert Code's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: XO Insert Code audit • PageFly Landing Page Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | XO Insert Code | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| page | Not ranked | #1 |
| landing pages | Not ranked | #2 |
| landing page builder | Not ranked | #3 |
| product content | #5 | Not ranked |
| scripts | #10 | Not ranked |
| Signal | XO Insert Code | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (103) | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +6 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +25 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +112 |
No reviews yet.
Shady, shady app, i uninstalled but their tracking code was still injected.
Both XO Insert Code and PageFly Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. XO Insert Code starts at Free; PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
XO Insert Code (5.0★, 103 reviews) and PageFly Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 5,641 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. XO Insert Code fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PageFly Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,641 reviews vs 103), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
XO Insert Code typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (103 reviews). PageFly Landing Page Builder aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,641 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
the app is a little clunky but the live chat assistance is invaluable. thank you Dan!
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
Migration support varies by app and category. XO Insert Code and PageFly Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from XO Insert Code" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
