Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Connect your store to Google and YouTube to help turn more shoppers into customers
| Google & YouTube | Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Connect your store to any advertising channel, customize your feed, and enrich your plain images.
| Metric | Google & YouTube | Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.4k | 7 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 4 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 157 new | — |
| Languages | 21 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2017 | Apr 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Google & YouTube's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Google & YouTube at Free to install, Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Google & YouTube has the larger user base (5,403 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google & YouTube's 5,403-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google & YouTube audit • Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Google & YouTube | Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager |
|---|---|---|
| your product | #1 | Not ranked |
| your products | #1 | Not ranked |
| google ads | #3 | Not ranked |
| rfid metafield management | Not ranked | #22 |
| staff payroll management | Not ranked | #22 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | Google & YouTube | Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5 ★ (5.4k) | 5.0 ★ (7) |
| Rating distribution | 582% 49% 32% 21% 16% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +27 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +157 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +473 | — |
Both Google & YouTube and Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager offer paid plans only. Google & YouTube starts at Free to install; Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 7 reviews) compared to Google & YouTube (4.5★ from 5,403 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Google & YouTube has the deeper published review base (5,403 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google & YouTube typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (5,403 reviews). Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google & YouTube and Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Marpipe ‑ Catalog Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
