Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Optimize ads with Meta Pixel, Facebook CAPI, Improve product data & integrate with Facebook channel
| Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads | Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Optimize ads with Facebook Pixel w/ CAPI, Product Feed & Catalog and Key metrics
| Metric | Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads | Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 998 | 8 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Languages | 5 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2020 | Apr 2026 |
Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads and Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads at Free plan available, Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads has the larger user base (998 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads audit • Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads | Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| facebook pixel | #31 | #82 |
| meta pixel | #3 | #11 |
| facebook pixels | #3 | #132 |
| pixel | #2 | #20 |
| pixels | #4 | #22 |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads and Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed offer paid plans only. Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads starts at Free plan available; Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads (4.9★, 998 reviews) and Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed (5.0★, 8 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads has the deeper published review base (998 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (998 reviews). Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Omega Facebook Pixel, Meta Ads and Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ego Facebook Pixel Meta Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
