Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Analytics with AI insights to find hidden store revenue, generate reports easily and boost profits.
| By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
Optimize ads with Meta Pixel, Facebook CAPI, Improve product data & integrate with Facebook channel
| Metric | By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 79 | ★ 856 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2017 | Jan 2020 |
By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics edges out Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics at Free plan available, Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has the larger user base (856 reviews vs 79), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed's 856-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics audit • Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed audit
| Keyword | By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| meta pixel | Not ranked | #2 |
| pixel | Not ranked | #2 |
| facebook pixel | Not ranked | #4 |
| ai insights | #24 | Not ranked |
| jotform ai | #121 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics and Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed offer paid plans only. By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics starts at Free plan available; Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 79 reviews) compared to Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed (4.8★ from 856 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (856 reviews vs 79), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (79 reviews). Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (856 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics and Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from By the Numbers ‑ Pro Analytics" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
