Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Unaric Voice lets you handle Microsoft Teams Phone calls directly in Salesforce without a third-party telephony platform. Calling stays governed in Microsoft Teams and is logged to Salesforce wherever reps answer. Works with Service Cloud Voice (SCV).
| CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT | Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
MiVoice Integration for Salesforce offers users communications features of Mitel’s MiVoice Business and MiContact Center, including inbound, outbound, and in-call capabilities, all fully embedded and integrated within the browser-based Salesforce window.
| Metric | CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT | Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 2.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 156 | 13 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 7 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2011 | Apr 2014 |
Based on the data on this page, CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2's 2.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 offers a free tier (free) while CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT has the larger user base (156 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT audit • Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT | Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 |
|---|---|---|
| call | #1 | #71 |
Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 156 reviews) compared to Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 (2.5★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT has the deeper published review base (156 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (156 reviews). Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CTI Data Connector for Salesforce - any PBX | MS-Teams | HVS | BYOT and Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mitel® MiVoice Integration for Salesforce R2" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.