Loading content…
Contacto vs Time&Expense Project
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Time&Expense Project | Contacto | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Time&Expense Project | Contacto | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Native Time & Expense solution supporting Multi-Currency Expense and PerDiem management and Billing, Project planning (SoW) tracking and billing, Customer Approvals, Vacation tracking, Payroll reporting, etc. - capture on the fly via Mobile.
| Metric | Time&Expense Project | Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 32 | 25 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 3 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2009 | Aug 2022 |
Time&Expense Project and Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Time&Expense Project at paid, Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time&Expense Project audit • Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Time&Expense Project | Contacto |
|---|---|---|
| workflow | #113 | #99 |
Both Time&Expense Project and Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS offer paid plans only. Time&Expense Project starts at paid; Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time&Expense Project (5.0★, 32 reviews) and Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS (5.0★, 25 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Time&Expense Project has the deeper published review base (32 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Time&Expense Project typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time&Expense Project and Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Contacto — Omnichannel Contact Center | Call Center | Voice, Chat, WhatsApp, SMS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.