Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Set SLA goals, track time to SLA, and get automated breach alerts – directly in Jira. Monitor SLA performance across projects and generate compliance reports and dashboards for service desk and ITSM teams
| My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management | SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management gives you control over the Requests page with configurable fields, saved filters, user scopes, export options, and "View as" functionality. It enhances visibility, usability, and access for end users.
| Metric | My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management | SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 34 | ★ 113 |
| Active installs | 1,502+ | 759+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management and SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management at From $0/yr, SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) has the larger user base (113 reviews vs 34), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management audit • SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) audit
| — |
| Keyword | My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management | SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #28 |
Both My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management and SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) offer paid plans only. My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management starts at From $0/yr; SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management (4.5★, 34 reviews) and SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) (4.5★, 113 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) has the deeper published review base (113 vs 34), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (34 reviews). SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (113 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management and SLA Time and Report for Jira (SLA Management & Compliance) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from My Requests Extension for Jira Service Management" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.