What is Multi-Level Cascading Select's Atlassian App Store audit score?

Multi-Level Cascading Select scored 60/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 80/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 50/100, Technical & Support 50/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Atlassian listings.

What is Multi-Level Cascading Select doing well?

Multi-Level Cascading Select's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 100/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 4 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Multi-Level Cascading Select loses its current edge in this category.

What can Multi-Level Cascading Select improve?

The weakest area in Multi-Level Cascading Select's audit is Languages, scored at 0/100. The failing checks are language count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.

AppRanks

Multi-Level Cascading Listing Audit — 60/100

Quick verdict

Generated from Multi-Level Cascading Select's audit data

Multi-Level Cascading Select scores 60/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 4 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and technical & support (50/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.

Multi-Level Cascading Select

Independent listing audit — Atlassian

60/100·grade C·★ 3.65 (25)·audited 2d ago·0 changes in 30d

View app

60/100

Grade C

Critical gaps

Overall

60/100

weighted across 6 areas

Grade

needs lift

Last audit

2d ago

refreshed 1h ago

Changes

0 30d

view history →

This is an independent listing audit for Multi-Level Cascading Select on Atlassian. It scored 60/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Atlassian listing.

Section breakdown

Detailed checks & fixes

Title Length28/50 chars
Title Keywords4 keywords found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title

Introduction203/150 chars
Intro Keywords18 unique keywords
Description377/5000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords31 unique keywords
Demo StoreNo demo store URL

High impact

Description

Your description uses 377 of 5000 characters. Expand it with features, benefits, and use cases.

App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found

High impact

Screenshot Count

Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.

Category CountOnly 1 category
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed

Medium impact

Category Count

Add your app to at least 2 categories to appear in more browse results.

Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing Plans6 plan(s) with details

Medium impact

Demo Store

Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.

Language CountNo languages listed

Medium impact

Language Count

Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.

Track how this score changes over time

Get alerts when Multi-Level Cascading Select or any rival changes their listing — free.

Start tracking free

Methodology

Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary

Explore further

HistoryMulti-Level Cascading Select changes0 updates in 30d BenchmarkLanguages rankingWhere Multi-Level Cascading Select sits AppsMulti-Level Cascading Select overviewReviews · keywords BestTop Atlassian appsBeyond Multi-Level Cascading Select MethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubric GlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections

Last updated: September 5, 2026

Quick verdict

Multi-Level Cascading Select

How Multi-Level Cascading Select's 60/100 breaks down

Frequently asked questions

What is Multi-Level Cascading Select's Atlassian App Store audit score?

What is Multi-Level Cascading Select doing well?

What can Multi-Level Cascading Select improve?

Explore further