Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Link Amazon, eBay, Etsy, Shopify, Walmart, Back Market, Newegg & WooCommerce with Zendesk
| ChannelReply | Profanity Checker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
App promotes respectful responses, blocks profanity-matching agent replies.
| Metric | ChannelReply | Profanity Checker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 167 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free to install | $2.00 per agent, per month |
Based on the data on this page, ChannelReply is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Profanity Checker's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, ChannelReply offers a free tier (Free to install) while Profanity Checker starts at $2.00 per agent, per month. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
ChannelReply has the larger user base (167 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Profanity Checker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ChannelReply; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Profanity Checker's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ChannelReply's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ChannelReply audit • Profanity Checker audit
ChannelReply is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free to install). Profanity Checker starts at $2.00 per agent, per month. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. ChannelReply does carry the larger published review base (167 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. ChannelReply has the deeper published review base (167 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ChannelReply typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (167 reviews). Profanity Checker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ChannelReply and Profanity Checker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Profanity Checker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
