Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Quickly Download tickets and Users in to CSV from Zendesk Support.
| CSV Ticket & User Exporter | Hide Ticket Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | CSV Ticket & User Exporter | Hide Ticket Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 865 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Hide Ticket Fields is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs CSV Ticket & User Exporter's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: CSV Ticket & User Exporter at Free, Hide Ticket Fields at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Hide Ticket Fields has the larger user base (865 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CSV Ticket & User Exporter's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Hide Ticket Fields; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CSV Ticket & User Exporter's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Hide Ticket Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CSV Ticket & User Exporter audit • Hide Ticket Fields audit
No tracked changes.
Both CSV Ticket & User Exporter and Hide Ticket Fields offer paid plans only. CSV Ticket & User Exporter starts at Free; Hide Ticket Fields starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Hide Ticket Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 865 reviews) compared to CSV Ticket & User Exporter (3.0★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Hide Ticket Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Hide Ticket Fields has the deeper published review base (865 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CSV Ticket & User Exporter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Hide Ticket Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (865 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CSV Ticket & User Exporter and Hide Ticket Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CSV Ticket & User Exporter" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
