Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Harvestr | Aha! | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Harvestr | Aha! | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Harvestr | Aha! |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 31 | ★ 166 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Harvestr is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Aha!'s 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Harvestr at Free to install, Aha! at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Aha! has the larger user base (166 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Harvestr's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Harvestr; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Aha!'s 166-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Harvestr's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Harvestr audit • Aha! audit
Both Harvestr and Aha! offer paid plans only. Harvestr starts at Free to install; Aha! starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Harvestr has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Aha! (3.0★ from 166 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Harvestr holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Aha! has the deeper published review base (166 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Harvestr typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). Aha! typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (166 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Harvestr and Aha! both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Harvestr" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.