Loading content…
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Time Tracking | Translate Conversations | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Time Tracking | Translate Conversations |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.7k | 16 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | Multiple plans available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Translate Conversations is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Time Tracking's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Time Tracking offers a free tier (Free) while Translate Conversations starts at Multiple plans available. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Time Tracking has the larger user base (5,675 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Translate Conversations's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Translate Conversations; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Time Tracking's 5,675-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Translate Conversations's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time Tracking audit • Translate Conversations audit
Time Tracking is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Translate Conversations starts at Multiple plans available. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Translate Conversations has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to Time Tracking (4.0★ from 5,675 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Time Tracking fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Translate Conversations is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Time Tracking has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,675 reviews vs 16), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Time Tracking typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,675 reviews). Translate Conversations aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (16 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time Tracking and Translate Conversations both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Translate Conversations" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.