| Time Tracking | Customer View for Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Let agents view the 'Title shown to customers' for easier ticket handling and better alignment.
| Metric | Time Tracking | Customer View for Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.7k | 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Time Tracking is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Customer View for Agents's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Time Tracking at Free, Customer View for Agents at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Time Tracking has the larger user base (5,678 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Customer View for Agents's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Time Tracking; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Customer View for Agents's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Time Tracking's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time Tracking audit • Customer View for Agents audit
No tracked changes.
Both Time Tracking and Customer View for Agents offer paid plans only. Time Tracking starts at Free; Customer View for Agents starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time Tracking has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 5,678 reviews) compared to Customer View for Agents (3.0★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (5,678 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Time Tracking typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (5,678 reviews). Customer View for Agents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time Tracking and Customer View for Agents both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Customer View for Agents" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.