Loading content…
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| GDPR Search Destroy | Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | GDPR Search Destroy | Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 36 | ★ 5.7k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, GDPR Search Destroy is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Time Tracking's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: GDPR Search Destroy at Free, Time Tracking at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Time Tracking has the larger user base (5,675 reviews vs 36), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GDPR Search Destroy's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to GDPR Search Destroy; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Time Tracking's 5,675-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GDPR Search Destroy's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GDPR Search Destroy audit • Time Tracking audit
No tracked changes.
Both GDPR Search Destroy and Time Tracking offer paid plans only. GDPR Search Destroy starts at Free; Time Tracking starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GDPR Search Destroy has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 36 reviews) compared to Time Tracking (4.0★ from 5,675 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. GDPR Search Destroy fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Time Tracking is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. Time Tracking has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,675 reviews vs 36), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
GDPR Search Destroy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (36 reviews). Time Tracking aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,675 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GDPR Search Destroy and Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GDPR Search Destroy" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.