Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Support sending and managing Zalo messages in the form of tickets
| Proactive Campaigns | Zalo by VIHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |

Email campaigns to reach your customer list and follow up on mail performance.
| Metric | Proactive Campaigns | Zalo by VIHAT |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 122 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Proactive Campaigns is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Zalo by VIHAT's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Proactive Campaigns at Free to install, Zalo by VIHAT at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Proactive Campaigns has the larger user base (122 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Zalo by VIHAT's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Proactive Campaigns; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zalo by VIHAT's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Proactive Campaigns's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Proactive Campaigns audit • Zalo by VIHAT audit
| Keyword | Proactive Campaigns | Zalo by VIHAT |
|---|---|---|
| messages | Not ranked | #19 |
Both Proactive Campaigns and Zalo by VIHAT offer paid plans only. Proactive Campaigns starts at Free to install; Zalo by VIHAT starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Proactive Campaigns does carry the larger published review base (122 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Proactive Campaigns has the deeper published review base (122 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Proactive Campaigns typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (122 reviews). Zalo by VIHAT typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Proactive Campaigns and Zalo by VIHAT both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Zalo by VIHAT" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.