Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create Jira issues from Zendesk, sync comments both ways, and close the loop between support and engineering. No Jira license needed for agents. Free trial included.
| Jira by Git-Zen | Harvest | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Jira by Git-Zen | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 439 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free 14-day trial | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Harvest is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Jira by Git-Zen's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Jira by Git-Zen at Free 14-day trial, Harvest at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Harvest has the larger user base (439 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Jira by Git-Zen's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Harvest; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Jira by Git-Zen's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Harvest's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jira by Git-Zen audit • Harvest audit
| Keyword | Jira by Git-Zen | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| both ways | #1 | Not ranked |
| trial included | #6 | Not ranked |
| analytics | Not ranked | #13 |
Both Jira by Git-Zen and Harvest offer paid plans only. Jira by Git-Zen starts at Free 14-day trial; Harvest starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Harvest does carry the larger published review base (439 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Harvest has the deeper published review base (439 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jira by Git-Zen typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Harvest typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (439 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jira by Git-Zen and Harvest both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Jira by Git-Zen" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
