Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| MCP Server | 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Softphone do PABX Virtual na Zendesk. API, CTI, 0800, 4004, Gravação e Report.
| Metric | MCP Server | 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 17 | ★ 92 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
MCP Server and 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: MCP Server at Free, 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most support teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MCP Server audit • 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual audit
No tracked changes.
Both MCP Server and 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual offer paid plans only. MCP Server starts at Free; 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
MCP Server (5.0★, 17 reviews) and 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual (5.0★, 92 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual does carry the larger published review base (92 vs 17). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual has the deeper published review base (92 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
MCP Server typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (92 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MCP Server and 55PBX Softphone PABX Virtual both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MCP Server" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
