Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ticket History | Translate.com by Machine | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Go global with Translate.com. A multilingual support ticket translation tool
| Metric | Ticket History | Translate.com by Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 523 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Ticket History is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Translate.com by Machine's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Ticket History at Free, Translate.com by Machine at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Ticket History has the larger user base (523 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Translate.com by Machine's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Ticket History; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Translate.com by Machine's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ticket History's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ticket History audit • Translate.com by Machine audit
No tracked changes.
Both Ticket History and Translate.com by Machine offer paid plans only. Ticket History starts at Free; Translate.com by Machine starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Ticket History does carry the larger published review base (523 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Ticket History has the deeper published review base (523 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ticket History typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (523 reviews). Translate.com by Machine typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ticket History and Translate.com by Machine both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Translate.com by Machine" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
