Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ticket History | Clone Ticket | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Ticket History | Clone Ticket |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 523 | 318 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Ticket History is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Clone Ticket's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Ticket History at Free, Clone Ticket at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Ticket History has the larger user base (523 reviews vs 318), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Clone Ticket's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Ticket History; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Clone Ticket's 318-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ticket History's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ticket History audit • Clone Ticket audit
Both Ticket History and Clone Ticket offer paid plans only. Ticket History starts at Free; Clone Ticket starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Ticket History has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 523 reviews) compared to Clone Ticket (3.0★ from 318 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Ticket History holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Ticket History has the deeper published review base (523 vs 318), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ticket History typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (523 reviews). Clone Ticket typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (318 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ticket History and Clone Ticket both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Clone Ticket" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
