Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Search, export, and bulk update tickets, users, and organizations fast.
| Advanced Search Plus | ChargeDesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Manage PayPal, Stripe, Braintree, WooCommerce, Zuora & more inside Zendesk.
| Metric | Advanced Search Plus | ChargeDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 7 | ★ 160 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Multiple plans available | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Advanced Search Plus is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs ChargeDesk's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, ChargeDesk offers a free tier (Free to install) while Advanced Search Plus starts at Multiple plans available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
ChargeDesk has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Advanced Search Plus's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Advanced Search Plus; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ChargeDesk's 160-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Advanced Search Plus's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Advanced Search Plus audit • ChargeDesk audit
| Keyword | Advanced Search Plus | ChargeDesk |
|---|---|---|
| analytics | #16 | Not ranked |
ChargeDesk is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free to install). Advanced Search Plus starts at Multiple plans available. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Advanced Search Plus has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 7 reviews) compared to ChargeDesk (4.0★ from 160 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Advanced Search Plus holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. ChargeDesk has the deeper published review base (160 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Advanced Search Plus typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). ChargeDesk typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (160 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Advanced Search Plus and ChargeDesk both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Advanced Search Plus" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.