| Smart iFrame | Stylo Sentiment Scores | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Predictive CSAT and Sentiment Scoring for Zendesk tickets powered by ChatGPT
| Metric | Smart iFrame | Stylo Sentiment Scores |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 11 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Stylo Sentiment Scores is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Smart iFrame's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Smart iFrame at Free, Stylo Sentiment Scores at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Stylo Sentiment Scores; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Smart iFrame's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Stylo Sentiment Scores's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Smart iFrame audit • Stylo Sentiment Scores audit
Both Smart iFrame and Stylo Sentiment Scores offer paid plans only. Smart iFrame starts at Free; Stylo Sentiment Scores starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Stylo Sentiment Scores has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to Smart iFrame (4.0★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Stylo Sentiment Scores holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Stylo Sentiment Scores has the deeper published review base (11 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Smart iFrame typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Stylo Sentiment Scores typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Smart iFrame and Stylo Sentiment Scores both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Smart iFrame" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.