Loading content…
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Page not found | RingEX by RingCentral | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Page not found | RingEX by RingCentral |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 71 | ★ 153 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Page not found is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs RingEX by RingCentral's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Page not found at Free to install, RingEX by RingCentral at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. RingEX by RingCentral has the larger user base (153 reviews vs 71), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Page not found's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Page not found; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RingEX by RingCentral's 153-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Page not found's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Page not found audit • RingEX by RingCentral audit
No tracked changes.
Both Page not found and RingEX by RingCentral offer paid plans only. Page not found starts at Free to install; RingEX by RingCentral starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Page not found has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 71 reviews) compared to RingEX by RingCentral (3.0★ from 153 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Page not found fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; RingEX by RingCentral is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace marketplace. RingEX by RingCentral has more onboarding documentation maturity (153 reviews vs 71), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Page not found typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (71 reviews). RingEX by RingCentral aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (153 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Page not found and RingEX by RingCentral both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Page not found" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.