Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Modern Image Formats | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Converts images to more modern formats such as WebP or AVIF during upload.
| Metric | Modern Image Formats | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.2 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 22 | ★ 4.2k |
| Active installs | — | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Modern Image Formats's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has the larger user base (4,207 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Modern Image Formats's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Modern Image Formats's 22-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Modern Image Formats audit • WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin audit
| Keyword | Modern Image Formats | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | Not ranked | #250 |
| contact | Not ranked | #250 |
| form builder | Not ranked | #410 |
WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,207 reviews) compared to Modern Image Formats (3.2★ from 22 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Modern Image Formats fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,207 reviews vs 22), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Modern Image Formats typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (22 reviews). WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4,207 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Modern Image Formats and WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Modern Image Formats" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
