Modern Image Formats Listing Audit: 46/100

Quick verdict

Modern Image Formats scores 46/100 (grade D) — 6 fails and 10 warnings across 22 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its three open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description) is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score.

Top strength: Title Optimization at 75/100. Audited Oct 21, 2026.

Top fixes

Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
Introduction (Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing

How Modern Image Formats's 46/100 breaks down

Modern Image Formats's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 75/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its three open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description) is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points) and Title Optimization (up to 3.7 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across WordPress Plugin Directory listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is Modern Image Formats's WordPress listing audit score?

Modern Image Formats scores 46/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 75/100, Description & Content 38/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is Modern Image Formats doing well?

Modern Image Formats's strongest section is Title Optimization at 75/100; 2 of 4 checks in it pass and 2 are open.

What should Modern Image Formats fix first?

Description & Content: Introduction (Missing; high impact), Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description (1149/5000 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact). Fixing them is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

Modern Image Formats