Hotjar vs WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)

Based on the data on this page, WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.5★ vs Hotjar's 2.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) has the larger user base (156 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Hotjar's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic); mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hotjar's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Hotjar or WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)?

WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 156 reviews) compared to Hotjar (2.9★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Hotjar or WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)?

WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 2.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Hotjar or WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) has the deeper published review base (156 vs 18), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Hotjar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (18 reviews). WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (156 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Hotjar and WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic)?

Migration support varies by app and category. Hotjar and WP Visitor Statistics (Real Time Traffic) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Hotjar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.