Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Black Studio TinyMCE Widget | Hotjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Black Studio TinyMCE Widget | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 191 | 18 |
| Active installs | 200,000+ | 70,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Black Studio TinyMCE Widget is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.8★ vs Hotjar's 2.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Black Studio TinyMCE Widget has the larger user base (191 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Hotjar's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Black Studio TinyMCE Widget; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hotjar's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Black Studio TinyMCE Widget's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Black Studio TinyMCE Widget audit • Hotjar audit
| Keyword | Black Studio TinyMCE Widget | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #111 | Not ranked |
| live support | #247 | Not ranked |
| survey | Not ranked | #325 |
| form builder | #918 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Black Studio TinyMCE Widget has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 191 reviews) compared to Hotjar (2.9★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Black Studio TinyMCE Widget holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Black Studio TinyMCE Widget has the deeper published review base (191 vs 18), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Black Studio TinyMCE Widget typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (191 reviews). Hotjar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (18 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Black Studio TinyMCE Widget and Hotjar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Hotjar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
