Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Lightspeed POS | Request a Quote | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Lightspeed POS | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 41 | ★ 159 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $249/year | ★ $69/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Request a Quote is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace merchants — 4.7★ vs Lightspeed POS's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing differs significantly: Request a Quote at $69/year vs Lightspeed POS at $249/year (Lightspeed POS is roughly 3.6x the entry-tier cost of Request a Quote). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor. Request a Quote has the larger user base (159 reviews vs 41), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightspeed POS's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Request a Quote; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightspeed POS's 41-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Request a Quote's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightspeed POS audit • Request a Quote audit
| Keyword | Lightspeed POS | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| form | #1812 | #1223 |
| payment | #1812 | #1223 |
Both Lightspeed POS and Request a Quote offer paid plans only. Lightspeed POS starts at $249/year; Request a Quote starts at $69/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Request a Quote has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 159 reviews) compared to Lightspeed POS (4.3★ from 41 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Lightspeed POS fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Request a Quote is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Request a Quote has more onboarding documentation maturity (159 reviews vs 41), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Lightspeed POS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (41 reviews). Request a Quote aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (159 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightspeed POS and Request a Quote both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightspeed POS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
