Request a Quote scores 41/100 (grade D) — 7 fails and 10 warnings across 21 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Categories & Discoverability — fixing its three open checks (Category Count, Feature Tags and Integrations) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Audited Nov 6, 2026.
Top fixes
Language Count(Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Screenshot Count(Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
Description(Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing
41/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Title Length15/50 chars — under 50% of limit
Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageNo separator found
Medium impact
Title Length
Your title uses only 15 of 50 available characters. Add relevant keywords to improve discoverability.
Introduction122/200 chars
Intro Keywords12 unique keywords
DescriptionMissing
Description KeywordsNo keywords in description
High impact
Description
Add a detailed app description explaining features, benefits, and use cases.
App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found
High impact
Screenshot Count
Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.
Category CountNo categories
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed
High impact
Category Count
Assign your app to relevant categories — this is essential for marketplace discoverability.
Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing PlansNo pricing plans listed
Medium impact
Demo Store
Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.
Language CountNo languages listed
Medium impact
Language Count
Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when Request a Quote or any rival changes their listing — free.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How Request a Quote's 41/100 breaks down
Request a Quote's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Categories & Discoverability — fixing its three open checks (Category Count, Feature Tags and Integrations) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Description & Content (up to 12.5 points), Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across WooCommerce Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is Request a Quote's WooCommerce listing audit score?
Request a Quote scores 41/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is Request a Quote doing well?
Request a Quote's strongest section is Title Optimization at 63/100; 1 of 4 checks in it pass and 3 are open.
What should Request a Quote fix first?
Categories & Discoverability: Category Count (No categories; high impact), Feature Tags (No feature tags; medium impact), Integrations (No integrations listed; low impact). Fixing them is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.