Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| B2B Request a Quote | Request a Quote | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | B2B Request a Quote | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 46 | ★ 159 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $49/year | $69/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
B2B Request a Quote and Request a Quote are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing is noticeably different: B2B Request a Quote at $49/year vs Request a Quote at $69/year (~41% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage merchants the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market merchants should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified. Request a Quote has the larger user base (159 reviews vs 46), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. B2B Request a Quote's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: B2B Request a Quote audit • Request a Quote audit
| Keyword | B2B Request a Quote | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| form | #303 | #119 |
| payment | #303 | #119 |
Both B2B Request a Quote and Request a Quote offer paid plans only. B2B Request a Quote starts at $49/year; Request a Quote starts at $69/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
B2B Request a Quote (4.7★, 46 reviews) and Request a Quote (4.7★, 159 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. B2B Request a Quote fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Request a Quote is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Request a Quote has more onboarding documentation maturity (159 reviews vs 46), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
B2B Request a Quote typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (46 reviews). Request a Quote aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (159 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. B2B Request a Quote and Request a Quote both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from B2B Request a Quote" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
