AppRanks verdict
Generated from live data on this pageRequest a Quote edges out User Defined pricing - Name your price based on user roles on rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing is noticeably different: User Defined pricing - Name your price based on user roles at $49/year vs Request a Quote at $69/year (~41% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage merchants the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market merchants should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified. Request a Quote has the larger user base (159 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. User Defined pricing - Name your price based on user roles's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Request a Quote; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Defined pricing - Name your price based on user roles's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Request a Quote's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: User Defined pricing - Name your price based on user roles audit • Request a Quote audit
