Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Your trusted one-stop global payment, growth and digitization solution provider, powered by AI-driven technologies and services. Improve your checkout with support for cards and local wallets. Enjoy easy setup, quick onboarding, and seamless payments on WooCommerce to connect with more customers.
| Antom | Request a Quote | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Allow your customers to add product(s) to quote basket and ask for price estimate by submitting a customizable quote form.
| Metric | Antom | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 161 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | $69/year |
Antom and Request a Quote are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Antom offers a free tier (Free) while Request a Quote starts at $69/year. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Request a Quote has the larger user base (161 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Antom's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most store owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Antom audit • Request a Quote audit
| Keyword | Antom | Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| form | #541 | #119 |
| payment | #541 | #119 |
Antom is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Request a Quote starts at $69/year. Both publish their pricing on the WooCommerce Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Antom (4.7★, 3 reviews) and Request a Quote (4.7★, 161 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.7★. Request a Quote does carry the larger published review base (161 vs 3). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Request a Quote has the deeper published review base (161 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Antom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Request a Quote typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (161 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Antom and Request a Quote both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Antom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.