Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| PDF Viewer & Downloader | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | PDF Viewer & Downloader | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 4k |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
Based on the data on this page, WhatsApp is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs PDF Viewer & Downloader's 3.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, WhatsApp offers a free tier (Free plan available) while PDF Viewer & Downloader starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
WhatsApp has the larger user base (3,958 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PDF Viewer & Downloader's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PDF Viewer & Downloader's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PDF Viewer & Downloader audit • WhatsApp audit
| — |
| Keyword | PDF Viewer & Downloader | |
|---|---|---|
| with whatsapp | Not ranked | #1 |
| chat | Not ranked | #3 |
| chat button | Not ranked | #4 |
| download | #6 | Not ranked |
| downloads | #6 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
WhatsApp is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). PDF Viewer & Downloader starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 3,958 reviews) compared to PDF Viewer & Downloader (3.6★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. WhatsApp has the deeper published review base (3,958 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PDF Viewer & Downloader typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). WhatsApp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,958 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PDF Viewer & Downloader and WhatsApp both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PDF Viewer & Downloader" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
