Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Local Delivery With Shipday | S | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Local Delivery With Shipday | S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 7 | 6 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Local Delivery With Shipday's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Local Delivery With Shipday starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Local Delivery With Shipday's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Local Delivery With Shipday audit • S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA audit
| — |
| Keyword | Local Delivery With Shipday | S |
|---|---|---|
| delivery date | #5 | #2 |
| prevent delivery | #5 | #4 |
| prevent delivery issues | #5 | #4 |
| delivery issues | #5 | #4 |
| estimated delivery | #7 | #3 |
S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Local Delivery With Shipday starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to Local Delivery With Shipday (2.8★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Local Delivery With Shipday has the deeper published review base (7 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Local Delivery With Shipday typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Local Delivery With Shipday and S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
