What can S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA improve?

The weakest area in S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's audit is Categories & Discoverability, scored at 50/100. The failing checks are feature tags, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.

AppRanks

S: Estimated Delivery Listing Audit — 72/100

Quick verdict

Generated from S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's audit data

S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA scores 72/100 across 6 category checks, which puts it in the healthy band — focused gaps rather than systemic problems. Strengths: title optimization at 100/100 and visual assets at 88/100 carry the headline — both above the 72/100 overall. Watch-items: languages (50/100) and technical & support (50/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.

S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA

Independent listing audit — Wix

72/100·grade B·★ 5 (6)·audited 1d ago·0 changes in 30d

View app

72/100

Grade B

Needs work

Overall: 72/100
Grade: B
Last audit: 1d ago
Changes: 0 30d

This is an independent listing audit for S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA on Wix. It scored 72/100 (grade B) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Categories & Discoverability at 50/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Wix listing.

Section breakdown

Detailed checks & fixes

Title Length30/50 chars
Title Keywords4 keywords found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title

Introduction47/200 chars — too short
Intro Keywords6 unique keywords
Description446/2000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords35 unique keywords
Feature List4/5 features — add more
Feature ClarityAll features within 80 char limit
SEO Title30/60 chars
SEO Description47/160 chars
Demo StoreNo demo store URL

Medium impact

Introduction

Your introduction is only 47 characters. Use closer to 200 characters to fully describe your app.

App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot Count5 screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found
Screenshot Variety5 unique screenshots

Medium impact

Hero Video

Add a demo video to increase engagement — listings with videos get higher conversion rates.

Category CountOnly 1 category
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed

Medium impact

Category Count

Add your app to at least 2 categories to appear in more browse results.

Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing Plans3 plan(s) with details

Medium impact

Demo Store

Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.

Language CountOnly 1 language
EnglishEnglish supported
SpanishSpanish not listed
FrenchFrench not listed
GermanGerman not listed
PortuguesePortuguese not listed

Medium impact

Language Count

Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.

Track how this score changes over time

Get alerts when S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA or any rival changes their listing — free.

Start tracking free

Methodology

Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary

Explore further

HistoryS: Estimated Delivery Date ETA changes0 updates in 30d BenchmarkCategories & Discoverability rankingWhere S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA sits AppsS: Estimated Delivery Date ETA overviewReviews · keywords BestTop Wix appsBeyond S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA MethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubric GlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections

Last updated: July 11, 2026

How S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's 72/100 breaks down

S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's overall score of 72/100 is a healthy result with specific areas to tighten, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (100/100, +28 vs overall); the weakest is Languages (50/100), 22 points below the overall — a meaningful but not dominant gap. Top three by score: Title Optimization (100), Visual Assets (88), Description & Content (78).

Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Wix App Market listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].

Frequently asked questions

What is S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's Wix App Store audit score?

S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA scored 72/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a healthy overall result. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 78/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 50/100, Technical & Support 50/100, Languages 50/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Wix listings.

What is S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA doing well?

S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 100/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 4 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before S: Estimated Delivery Date ETA loses its current edge in this category.