Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google Reviews with AI Summary | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Google Reviews with AI Summary | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 16 | ★ 4k |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
WhatsApp edges out Google Reviews with AI Summary on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, WhatsApp offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Google Reviews with AI Summary starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
WhatsApp has the larger user base (3,958 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Reviews with AI Summary's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Reviews with AI Summary's 16-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Reviews with AI Summary audit • WhatsApp audit
| — |
| Keyword | Google Reviews with AI Summary | |
|---|---|---|
| month week | #20 | #3 |
| with whatsapp | #28 | #1 |
| customers items | #24 | #22 |
| refunds customers | #25 | #22 |
| site with | #12 | #42 |
WhatsApp is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Google Reviews with AI Summary starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 3,958 reviews) compared to Google Reviews with AI Summary (4.8★ from 16 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. WhatsApp has the deeper published review base (3,958 vs 16), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Reviews with AI Summary typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). WhatsApp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,958 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Reviews with AI Summary and WhatsApp both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Reviews with AI Summary" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
