Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fancy Web Effects | Magic Scroll | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Fancy Web Effects | Magic Scroll |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 8 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Magic Scroll is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Fancy Web Effects's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Magic Scroll offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Fancy Web Effects starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Magic Scroll; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fancy Web Effects's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Magic Scroll's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fancy Web Effects audit • Magic Scroll audit
| Keyword | Fancy Web Effects | Magic Scroll |
|---|---|---|
| core web | #7 | #31 |
| web vitals | #7 | #31 |
| core web vitals | #7 | #32 |
| web vitals check | #10 | #39 |
| speed core web | #13 | #39 |
Magic Scroll is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Fancy Web Effects starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Magic Scroll has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Fancy Web Effects (2.8★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Magic Scroll holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fancy Web Effects has the deeper published review base (8 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fancy Web Effects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Magic Scroll typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fancy Web Effects and Magic Scroll both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Magic Scroll" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
