Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 77 | ★ 4k |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
Based on the data on this page, WhatsApp is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Elfsight WhatsApp Chat's 2.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, WhatsApp offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Elfsight WhatsApp Chat starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
WhatsApp has the larger user base (3,958 reviews vs 77), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Elfsight WhatsApp Chat's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Elfsight WhatsApp Chat's 77-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Elfsight WhatsApp Chat audit • WhatsApp audit
| — |
| Keyword | Elfsight WhatsApp Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| with whatsapp | #21 | #1 |
| chat whatsapp | #181 | #4 |
| #22 | #1 | |
| customers via whatsapp | #21 | #2 |
| whatsapp facebook messenger | #25 | #2 |
WhatsApp is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Elfsight WhatsApp Chat starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 3,958 reviews) compared to Elfsight WhatsApp Chat (2.7★ from 77 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 2.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. WhatsApp has the deeper published review base (3,958 vs 77), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Elfsight WhatsApp Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (77 reviews). WhatsApp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,958 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Elfsight WhatsApp Chat and WhatsApp both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Elfsight WhatsApp Chat" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
