Loading content…
All-in-one CRM vs eDesk
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| All-in-one CRM | eDesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| All-in-one CRM | eDesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | All-in-one CRM | eDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 1.1 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 38 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 5 supported |
All-in-one CRM edges out eDesk on rating (1.1★ vs 1.0★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: All-in-one CRM at Paid, eDesk at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to All-in-one CRM; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — eDesk's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than All-in-one CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: All-in-one CRM audit • eDesk audit
| Keyword | All-in-one CRM | eDesk |
|---|---|---|
| locations in | #6 | Not ranked |
| in minutes | #6 | Not ranked |
| customer | #9 | Not ranked |
| ecommerce | Not ranked | #23 |
| marketplace | Not ranked | #27 |
Both All-in-one CRM and eDesk offer paid plans only. All-in-one CRM starts at Paid; eDesk starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
All-in-one CRM has the higher average rating (1.1★ from 38 reviews) compared to eDesk (1.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. All-in-one CRM fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; eDesk is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. All-in-one CRM has more onboarding documentation maturity (38 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
All-in-one CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (38 reviews). eDesk aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. All-in-one CRM and eDesk both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from eDesk" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.