Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Common Ninja Comparison Tables | Request For Quotation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Common Ninja Comparison Tables | Request For Quotation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.7 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 35 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Common Ninja Comparison Tables is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 1.7★ vs Request For Quotation's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Common Ninja Comparison Tables offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Request For Quotation starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Common Ninja Comparison Tables; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Request For Quotation's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Common Ninja Comparison Tables's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Common Ninja Comparison Tables audit • Request For Quotation audit
| Keyword | Common Ninja Comparison Tables | Request For Quotation |
|---|---|---|
| pricing | #28 | #43 |
Common Ninja Comparison Tables is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Request For Quotation starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Common Ninja Comparison Tables holds the higher average rating (1.7★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Common Ninja Comparison Tables has the deeper published review base (35 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Common Ninja Comparison Tables typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). Request For Quotation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Common Ninja Comparison Tables and Request For Quotation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Request For Quotation" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
